Quality Assurance Services That Catch Regressions Before Your Users Do
Automated tests wired into CI to catch regressions before release, and manual testing focused on the exploratory edge cases automation reliably misses. Not a final check after the code's already shipped.
Got it — thanks!
A senior engineer will review this and reply within one business day.
What Quality Assurance Covers
Automated Testing
End-to-end and unit tests wired into CI to catch regressions on every change, not just before release.
Manual & Exploratory Testing
Focused on the edge cases, usability issues, and exploratory scenarios automation reliably misses.
Test Coverage Audits
Identifies the highest-risk untested areas of an existing codebase to prioritize new coverage.
Mobile & Cross-Device QA
Real-device testing across iOS and Android, not just web applications.
Built for Specific Buyers, Not Everyone
Teams Shipping Regressions to Production
Bugs keep reaching users that a proper test suite would have caught earlier.
Engineering Teams Without Dedicated QA
Developers are testing their own code with no independent verification layer.
Products Scaling Past Manual-Only Testing
Manual testing before every release has stopped scaling with release frequency.
If your release cadence is very low and manual spot-checks are genuinely sufficient, a full automated QA investment may not pay off yet — we'll say so honestly on the audit call.
From Kickoff to Launch
Coverage Audit
We review existing test coverage to find the highest-risk untested areas.
→ Coverage audit + priority listAutomated Test Build
Automated tests built and wired into CI, prioritized by risk.
→ CI-integrated test suiteManual & Exploratory Pass
Manual testing covers edge cases and usability issues automation misses.
→ Manual test findingsOngoing Coverage
Test coverage maintained and extended as the product evolves, if the engagement continues.
→ Evolving, maintained test suiteTechnologies We Use
Common Questions About Quality Assurance
Do you do manual testing, automated testing, or both?
Both — automated tests run in CI to catch regressions on every change, while manual testing focuses on the exploratory, edge-case, and usability issues automation reliably misses.
Can you set up test automation for our existing codebase?
Yes — we start with a test-coverage audit to find the highest-risk untested areas, then build automated coverage there first rather than testing everything equally.
What testing tools do you use?
Playwright and Cypress for end-to-end testing, Jest for unit tests, with tooling chosen to match your existing stack rather than a fixed default.
Do you test mobile apps too?
Yes — mobile QA including real-device testing is part of our coverage, not limited to web applications.
Can QA be an ongoing engagement, not just a one-time audit?
Yes — many QA relationships continue as an ongoing engagement, since test coverage needs to evolve alongside the product, not just get audited once.